You basicaly say people should disregard all reviews except the few reviews by PB fans (that are much more prone to bias) that will be positive.
I agree with you that there are usually some straight up trash reviews, but your whole post and especially this last sentence feels a little bit manipulative to be honest. Regardless though, just don't bet on seeing any review that actually gives a proper impression of what the game is like, save for the inevitable few outliers who tend to be fans of PB themselves. The first game isn't perfect by any means, and the second game will probably have its flaws as well. Lots of reviews are just clearly biased towards mainstream rpgs, some of them even outright making the claim that Elex didn't achieve any of the ambitions the devs were aiming for and is going to go down in history as a game that could've been good but failed in every way, and it's probably not getting a sequel this time guys trust me. Reading through the old reviews of the first game generally makes me cringe. There's always something, wether it's a critic complaining that the combat doesn't compete with Dark Souls or that the world isn't as big as Skyrim, but they generally get a bad review on the basis that they're not the best at any aspect in particular. If there's ever something you want to win a bet on, it's that PB games will be trashed and tossed aside as "bad but the effort is cute" rpgs on release by most game critics.
0 kommentar(er)
